Overview of our activities

This is the overview in figures and tables of the operational activities of the RvA in 2025.

Accreditations granted as of 31 December, 2025

New accreditations are regularly granted for the various standards. At the same time, mergers and acquisitions are also taking place in all segments, resulting in the withdrawal of accreditations. On balance, the total number of granted accreditations has decreased slightly. Within the medical laboratories, we see relatively many mergers, which is why the decrease is strongest there.

The table below shows the number of granted accreditations as of December 31, 2025, broken down by type of activity and accreditation standard. For comparison, the number of granted accreditations in 2024 is also shown.

Accreditations granted as of 31 December, 2025

Standard

Explanation

Netherlands

Abroad

Total

Netherlands

Abroad

Total

2024

2024

2024

2025

2025

2025


Certification

ISO/IEC 17065

Products and services

62

3

65

63

3

66

ISO/IEC 17021

Management systems

44

14

58

43

11

54

ISO/IEC 17024

Persons

6

0

6

6

0

6


Subtotal certification

112

17

129

112

14

126


Inspection
ISO/IEC 17020

Inspection

140

1

141

141

1

142


Subtotal inspection

140

1

141

141

1

142


RvA mark laboratories

ISO/IEC 17025

Calibration

61

0

61

58

0

58

ISO/IEC 17025

Testing

250

5

255

249

5

254

ISO/IEC 17043

Proficiency testing

13

1

14

13

0

13

ISO 15189

Medical laboratories in MLA

208

11

219

194

10

204

EN/ISO 17034

Reference materials

2

0

2

2

0

2


Subtotal laboratories

534

17

551

516

15

531


Verification

ISO/IEC 17029

Verification

2

2

4

3

3

6


Subtotal verification

2

2

4

3

3

6

Accreditations worldwide in 2025

flag
0

Netherlands

pin_drop
0

Rest of Europe

travel_explore
0

Worldwide

New accreditations by type

The number of initial applications in 2025 was higher than in 2024. This applies to all types of accreditations, with the exception of medical laboratories. Compared to 2024, the weighted average of the processing time in 2025 increased by 4%.

Number and processing time from application until desicion

New accreditations by type

Type of accreditation

New accreditations

Average calendar days

New accreditations

Acerage processing time in calendar days

2024

2024

2025

2025


Certification

3

304

6

346

Inspection

3

251

5

319

Calibration laboratories

0

-

1

205

Testing laboratories

4

354

4

311

Medical laboratories

3

306

1

373

Verification

0

-

2

351

Other

0

-

0

-


Total

13

308*

19

321*


*This is a weighted average

Extensions of the scope of accreditation by type

The number of applications for scope extension was higher in 2025 for almost all activities than in 2024. The total weighted average of the turnaround time of the assessment of the extension applications in 2025 is more than 20% higher than in 2024. However, the average processing varies significantly depending on the activity and the individual application.

Number and processing time from application until decision

Extensions of the scope of accreditation by type

Type of accreditation
Extensions
Average calendar days
Extensions
Average calendar days
2024
2024
2025
2025

Certification

55

147

65

205

Inspection

8

166

9

111

Calibration laboratories

10

198

14

217

Testing laboratories

117

142

115

182

Medical laboratories

33

185

38

191

Verification

1

111

3

64

Other

1

133

0

-


Total

225

153*

244

187*


*This is a weighted average

Lenient regimes

A lenient regime applies to 17% of the accreditations granted. This percentage has increased compared to 2024. The percentages for each type of activity have generally risen as well.

Percentage of the overall accreditations for the relevant activity subject to a lenient regime

Lenient regimes

2024

2025


Certification

9%

10%

Inspection

20%

24%

Calibration laboratories

11%

10%

Testing laboratories

9%

10%

Medical laboratories

25%

28%

Organizers of proficiency testing schemes

14%

8%


Total

15%

17%


Disputes, suspensions and withdrawals

If an RvA assessment team is of the opinion that a customer does not meet the requirements, the team files a so-called non-conformity. It is possible that the customer does not agree with the team’s interpretation of the requirements. In that case, the assessed party has the option of filing an interpretation dispute. The handling of such a dispute reveals how the standard should be interpreted. In 2025, following a slight decrease in the number of disputes the previous year, the figure will return to the 2023 level.

Interpretation disputes graphic
<p>This horizontal bar chart shows the number of interpretation disputes per accreditation standard for 2023, 2024 and 2025.</p>
chevron_forwardInterpertation disputes per standard

This horizontal bar chart shows the number of interpretation disputes per accreditation standard for 2023, 2024 and 2025.

The outcomes of interpretation disputes in 2025

The outcomes of interpretation disputes in 2025 (including ‘Pending’)

Outcomes of disputes graphic
The outcomes of interpretation disputes in 2025

Withdrawn accreditations for some of the work areas

The table below shows per activity how many accreditations were withdrawn voluntarily and imposed in 2025 for some of the work areas. For comparison, the figures for 2024 are also shown.

Withdrawn accreditations for some of the work areas

Withdrawn accreditations for some of the work areas

Accreditation category

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

2024

2024

2024

2025

2025

2025


Certification

7

0

7

15

0

15

Inspection

0

0

0

13

0

13

Calibration laboratories

0

0

0

0

0

0

Testing laboratories

2

0

2

1

0

1

Medical laboratories

20

0

20

3

0

3

Other

0

0

0

0

0

0


Total

29

0

29

32

0

32


Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

The table below shows per activity how many accreditations were suspended voluntarily and imposed in 2025 for the entire scope. For comparison, the figures for 2024 are also shown.

Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

Accreditation category

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

2024

2024

2024

2025

2025

2025


Certification

2

0

2

6

1

7

Inspection

5

0

5

7

0

7

Calibration laboratories

0

0

0

5

0

5

Testing laboratories

4

0

4

7

0

7

Medical laboratories

12

0

12

13

2

15

Other

1

0

1

1

0

1


Total

24

0

24

39

3

42


Suspended accreditations for some of the work areas

The table below shows per activity how many accreditations were suspended voluntary and imposed in 2025 for some of the work areas. For comparison, the figures for 2024 are also shown.

Suspended accreditations for part of the work areas

Suspended accreditations for some of the work areas

Accreditation category

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

2024*

2024

2024

2025

2025

2025


Certification

0

0

0

1

1

2

Inspection

0

0

0

0

0

0

Calibration laboratories

0

0

0

0

0

0

Testing laboratories

3

0

3

1

0

1

Medical laboratories

2

0

2

0

0

0

Other

0

1

0

0

0

0


Total

5

1

5

2

1

3


* Some of the suspensions have now been lifted (2024: 2 certification bodies and 1 testing laboratory)

Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

The table below shows per activity how many accreditations were suspended voluntary and imposed in 2025 for the entire scope. For comparison, the figures for 2024 are also shown.

Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

Suspended accreditations for the entire scope

Accreditation category

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

Voluntary

Imposed

Total

2024

2024

2024

2025*

2025

2025


Certification

0

1

1

0

1

1

Inspection

0

0

0

0

0

0

Calibration laboratories

1

0

1

2

0

2

Testing laboratories

1

0

1

1

0

1

Medical laboratories

2

2

4

0

1

1

Other

0

0

0

0

0

0


Total

4

3

7

3

2

5


* Some of the suspensions have since been lifted (2025: 1 medical laboratory)

The handling of complaints

In accordance with the Dutch General Administrative Law Act (Algemene wet bestuursrecht), the RvA has a complaints procedure in place for any complaintsabout the RvA as an administrative authority. This procedure, QA008, can be accessed directly via our website (www.rva.nl/en).

The graphic shows the number of complaints received about the RvA (with a breakdown by complainant’s area of ​​work).

 

Outcome of complaints barchart
The handling of complaints
chevron_forwardThe processing of Complaints

This stacked bar chart shows how complaints were processed in 2022, 2023 and 2024 across five categories – Not admissible, Other, Certification, Inspection and Calibration/Medical/Test (Cal, Med, Test) – with the largest numbers of complaints each year in the Cal, Med, Test category and a noticeable increase over time in the Not admissible group.

A complaint concerns the conduct of the RvA or an RvA staff member. In 2025, we received 21 complaints, 18 of which were admissible. Most complaints concerned (the timeliness of) communication or the application of RvA procedures.

The RvA always enters into direct dialogue with the complainant. This has proven to be the best way to resolve the complaint to the complainant’s satisfaction.

Sometimes enquiries are received as complaints; these enquiries are answered and the complaints are recorded as inadmissible. Other inadmissible complaints do not, in most cases, concern the conduct of the RvA or an RvA employee.

Businesswoman is signing the contract to create fin-tech start up for the conference and gain investments for innovative service. Checking the details at smartphone. Hologram tech graphs.

Notifications and signals

In the event of dissatisfaction or doubts about the work of an accredited organisation, a notification can be submitted to the RvA. As a rule, the person submitting the notification has already complained to the accredited institution. If this is not the case, the RvA will, as it sees fit, incorporate the information into the supervision of the accredited organisation.

The graphic shows the number of reports received about accredited organizations.

 

Notifications and signals barchart
Notifications and signals
chevron_forwardNotifications and signals

This stacked bar chart presents the number of notifications received about accredited organizations in 2022, 2023 and 2024, broken down into four categories – Not admissible, Certification, Inspection and Calibration/Medical/Test (Cal, Med, Test) – showing that most notifications relate to non‑admissible cases and inspections, with smaller but notable numbers for certification and Cal, Med, Test across the three years.

 

A notification must be about the activities for which the organisation is accredited. Notifications contribute to the ability to express justified confidence in the accredited institution.

Most of the notifications are inadmissable. Often, the submitter has not first raised the issue with the accredited organisation to give it the opportunity to offer a solution. Another reason for declaring a report inadmissible is that it does not relate to accredited activities.

The majority of admissible notifications in 2025 concerned activities in the field of inspection. Notifications or signals are, in principle, investigated during the next regular assessment. Following a report, the RvA executive board may decide to carry out an additional assessment if the content of the report appears so serious that the reliability of the accredited organisation’s work must be called into question.

In 2025, five additional assessments are planned to investigate the reports. In 2024, there were two.

Objections and freedom of information requests

In 2025, 4 objections were submitted:

Enhanced assessment programme (objection withdrawn): 1
Decision on a request under the Open Government Act (Woo): 2
Decision on suspension: 1

In 2025, 9 Woo requests were submitted:

Withdrawn: 2
Inadmissible: 3
Documents shared with personal data and confidential documents redacted: 3
Documents not shared on the grounds of confidentiality of the information: 1

Objections and freedom of information requests graphic
Objections and freedom of information requests

Wij geven om jouw privacy

Wij en derde partijen gebruiken cookies op onze website voor statistische, voorkeurs- en marketingdoeleinden. Google Analytics-cookies zijn geanonimiseerd. U kunt uw voorkeur wijzigen door op `Zelf instellen` te klikken. Door op `Accepteren` te klikken accepteert u het gebruik van alle cookies zoals beschreven in onze privacyverklaring.

Powered by WP Brothers

Kies je privacyvoorkeuren

Via de cookieverklaring op onze website kun je jouw toestemming op elk moment wijzigen of intrekken. In ons privacybeleid vind je meer informatie over wie we zijn, hoe u contact met ons kunt opnemen en hoe we persoonlijke gegevens verwerken.

Noodzakelijk

Noodzakelijke cookies helpen onze website bruikbaarder te maken, door basisfuncties als paginanavigatie en toegang tot beveiligde gedeelten van de website mogelijk te maken. Zonder deze cookies kan de website niet naar behoren werken.

Voorkeuren

Voorkeurscookies zorgen ervoor dat de website informatie kan onthouden die van invloed is op het gedrag en de vormgeving van de website, zoals de taal van je voorkeur of de regio waar je woont.

Statistieken

Statistische cookies helpen ons begrijpen hoe de website wordt gebruikt, door anoniem gegevens te verzamelen en te rapporteren. Met deze informatie kunnen wij onze site blijven verbeteren voor optimaal gebruik.

Marketing

Marketingcookies gebruiken we om relevante content en advertenties te tonen op andere websites die je bezoekt, die zijn toegespitst op jouw interesses.